Home » The Golden Book about Leibniz by Sean Anderson Csiszar
The Golden Book about Leibniz Sean Anderson Csiszar

The Golden Book about Leibniz

Sean Anderson Csiszar

Published July 26th 2015
ISBN : 9781515243915
Paperback
48 pages
Enter the sum

 About the Book 

Gottfried Wilhelm von Leibniz (also Godefroi Guillaume Leibnitz, German (July 1, 1646 - November 14, 1716) was a German, polymath and philosopher, and to this day he occupies a prominent place in the history of mathematics and the history ofMoreGottfried Wilhelm von Leibniz (also Godefroi Guillaume Leibnitz, German (July 1, 1646 - November 14, 1716) was a German, polymath and philosopher, and to this day he occupies a prominent place in the history of mathematics and the history of philosophy. Most scholars believe Leibniz developed calculus independently of Isaac Newton, and Leibnizs notation has been widely used ever since it was published. It was only in the 20th century that his Law of Continuity and Transcendental Law of Homogeneity found mathematical implementation (by means of non-standard analysis). He became one of the most prolific inventors in the field of mechanical calculators. While working on adding automatic multiplication and division to Pascals calculator, he was the first to describe a pinwheel calculator in 1685 and invented the Leibniz wheel, used in the arithmometer, the first mass-produced mechanical calculator. He also refined the binary number system, which is the foundation of virtually all digital computers. In philosophy, Leibniz is most noted for his optimism, i.e., his conclusion that our Universe is, in a restricted sense, the best possible one that God could have created, an idea that was often lampooned by others such as Voltaire. Leibniz, along with Rene Descartes and Baruch Spinoza, was one of the three great 17th century advocates of rationalism. The work of Leibniz anticipated modern logic and analytic philosophy, but his philosophy also looks back to the scholastic tradition, in which conclusions are produced by applying reason of first principles or prior definitions rather than to empirical evidence.